It was no coincidence that this whatsapp phone number list declaration was made public in 1996 within the framework of the World Economic Forum in Davos. The fight against the laws This idea was also taken up in legal discourse. David R. Johnson and David G. Post, legal scholars specializing in the digital space, argued that if users want to whatsapp phone number list set rules on the Internet and these rules do not harm non-users, then "the law of the physical world should be revoked in favor of this way." of self-regulation”. But it wasn't whatsapp phone number list just "California ideology" that encouraged flouting the law. The teaching of disruptive innovations.
A widespread in business whatsapp phone number list schools, at some point led to an understanding of the law as something disruptive. This fight by tech companies and activists against the new laws, which continue to put technology whatsapp phone number list above democracy, continues to this day. For example, Google insisted that only California law apply to it, since searches from Europe are answered from California servers. Furthermore, it was argued that search results should not be classified as 'data processing'. The reasoning: Google is whatsapp phone number list not responsible for the results, since they are the product of the automated algorithm and cannot be controlled by the company.
This is where the worldview of the whatsapp phone number list company and the way of conceiving the Rule of Law become evident: first, automation in the form of algorithm as a service protects the mediating company from any legal whatsapp phone number list liability. Seen this way, John Perry Barlow's dream would come true: in the digital age, technology would take precedence over jurisprudence. Secondly, if any form of legal bond whatsapp phone number list existed, it could only exist in relation to a global order, presumably dominated by US law and administered by US judges.